Palestinians are an "invented people", says US Presidential hopeful Gingrich
2011 12 12

From: Guardian.co.uk


The US Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich has declared that the Palestinians are an "invented" people who want to destroy Israel.

The Jewish Channel, a cable TV station, posted online its interview with the former US House speaker , who has risen to the top of Republican nomination candidates to challenge Democratic President Barack Obama in the November 2012 election.

Gingrich differed from official US policy that respects the Palestinians as a people deserving of their own state based on negotiations with Israel. "Remember, there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire" until the early 20th century, Gingrich said.



Video from: YouTube.com


The US Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich has declared that the Palestinians are an "invented" people who want to destroy Israel.

The Jewish Channel, a cable TV station, posted online its interview with the former US House speaker , who has risen to the top of Republican nomination candidates to challenge Democratic President Barack Obama in the November 2012 election.

Gingrich differed from official US policy that respects the Palestinians as a people deserving of their own state based on negotiations with Israel. "Remember, there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire" until the early 20th century, Gingrich said.

"I think that we’ve had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and who were historically part of the Arab community. And they had a chance to go many places, and for a variety of political reasons we have sustained this war against Israel now since the 1940s, and it’s tragic," he said.

Most historians mark the start of Palestinian Arab nationalist sentiment as 1834, when Arab residents of the Palestinian region revolted against Ottoman rule.

Modern-day Israel, founded amid the 1948 Arab-Israel war, took shape along the lines of a 1947 UN plan for ethnic partition of the then-British ruled territory of Palestine. Arabs rejected the division.

Gingrich and other Republican candidates are seeking to attract Jewish support by vowing to bolster US ties with Israel if elected.

Gingrich said the Hamas militant group, which controls the Gaza Strip, and the the governing Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank, represented "an enormous desire to destroy Israel".

[...]


Read the full article at: guardian.co.uk
Image: Source





Ron Paul Says Palestinians Are Not an ’Invented People’
BY E.D. Kain | Forbes.com


[...]

Asked about these [Gingrich’s] remarks, Ron Paul disagreed saying that under the Ottoman Empire neither the Israelis or the Palestinians had an official state. Paul accused Gingrich of “stirring up trouble.” Paul’s views on the Israel-Palestine conflict are controversial.

Unlike many in both the Republican and Democratic parties, Paul has been a harsh critic of Israeli actions against Palestinians, and an even harsher critic of the US government’s unqualified support of Israel – a country he believes should manage its own destiny.

On Twitter, Gary Johnson – who was once again not invited to the debate - echoed Paul saying that Israel will determine its own future and that it’s wrong for us to presume to determine it for them.

Paul has been campaigning hard in Iowa. Can his free-market populism help him pass up Gingrich and Romney in the polls? Will his remarks on Israel and his fierce opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan help or hurt him with conservative Iowa voters?

Unlike Gingrich’s ‘bomb-throwing’ as Romney put it, Paul remains a steady and sober voice on matters of foreign policy, crony capitalism, and limited government. I don’t agree with him on every issue, but I respect his consistency and his sincerity. These are two qualities in very short supply this election season.

On a side note, Gingrich’s point that the Palestinians are in fact Arab is very odd. Arab people are defined by their linguistic unity. Saudis and Palestinians are Arabs and speak Arabic. Iranians are not Arabic. They speak Farsi. The fact that Palestinians are Arabic does not disqualify them as any nationality. The fact that Americans speak English does not make us citizens of the UK.

All Of Ron Paul’s Responses At The ABC Iowa GOP Debate (Video)


Read the full article at: forbes.com





Also tune into:

Gilad Atzmon - Hour 1 - The Wandering Who?

Gilad Atzmon - Hour 2 - Moral Interventionism & The Decline of the West

Gilad Atzmon - Zionism & Multiculturalism

Adrian Salbuchi - Zionism & Multiculturalism

Israel Shamir - Zionism & Multiculturalism

Kenneth Humphreys - Jesus Never Existed, Judaism & Christianity

Jay Weidner - The Clash of Civilizations & Pike’s Three World Wars

Tony Malone - Zionism, The Bible and The Israel, Palestine Conflict

Pierre Sabak - Priesthood of the Nazarenes, The Nazis & Zionists









"I think that we’ve had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and who were historically part of the Arab community. And they had a chance to go many places, and for a variety of political reasons we have sustained this war against Israel now since the 1940s, and it’s tragic," he said.

Most historians mark the start of Palestinian Arab nationalist sentiment as 1834, when Arab residents of the Palestinian region revolted against Ottoman rule.

Modern-day Israel, founded amid the 1948 Arab-Israel war, took shape along the lines of a 1947 UN plan for ethnic partition of the then-British ruled territory of Palestine. Arabs rejected the division.

Gingrich and other Republican candidates are seeking to attract Jewish support by vowing to bolster US ties with Israel if elected.

Gingrich said the Hamas militant group, which controls the Gaza Strip, and the the governing Palestinian Authority, which controls the West Bank, represented "an enormous desire to destroy Israel".

[...]


Read the full article at: guardian.co.uk





Ron Paul Says Palestinians Are Not an ’Invented People’
BY E.D. Kain | Forbes.com


[...]

Asked about these [Gingrich’s] remarks, Ron Paul disagreed saying that under the Ottoman Empire neither the Israelis or the Palestinians had an official state. Paul accused Gingrich of “stirring up trouble.” Paul’s views on the Israel-Palestine conflict are controversial.

Unlike many in both the Republican and Democratic parties, Paul has been a harsh critic of Israeli actions against Palestinians, and an even harsher critic of the US government’s unqualified support of Israel – a country he believes should manage its own destiny.

On Twitter, Gary Johnson – who was once again not invited to the debate - echoed Paul saying that Israel will determine its own future and that it’s wrong for us to presume to determine it for them.

Paul has been campaigning hard in Iowa. Can his free-market populism help him pass up Gingrich and Romney in the polls? Will his remarks on Israel and his fierce opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan help or hurt him with conservative Iowa voters?

Unlike Gingrich’s ‘bomb-throwing’ as Romney put it, Paul remains a steady and sober voice on matters of foreign policy, crony capitalism, and limited government. I don’t agree with him on every issue, but I respect his consistency and his sincerity. These are two qualities in very short supply this election season.

On a side note, Gingrich’s point that the Palestinians are in fact Arab is very odd. Arab people are defined by their linguistic unity. Saudis and Palestinians are Arabs and speak Arabic. Iranians are not Arabic. They speak Farsi. The fact that Palestinians are Arabic does not disqualify them as any nationality. The fact that Americans speak English does not make us citizens of the UK.


Read the full article at: forbes.com





Red Ice Radio:

Gilad Atzmon - Hour 1 - The Wandering Who?

Gilad Atzmon - Hour 2 - Moral Interventionism & The Decline of the West

Gilad Atzmon - Zionism & Multiculturalism

Adrian Salbuchi - Zionism & Multiculturalism

Israel Shamir - Zionism & Multiculturalism

Kenneth Humphreys - Jesus Never Existed, Judaism & Christianity

Jay Weidner - The Clash of Civilizations & Pike’s Three World Wars

Tony Malone - Zionism, The Bible and The Israel, Palestine Conflict

Pierre Sabak - Priesthood of the Nazarenes, The Nazis & Zionists








Related Articles


Latest News from our Front Page

Starbucks Supports Pro-GMO Company
2014 11 26
Another reason why you should not go to Starbucks. Starbucks has an image of being a socially responsible, environmentally friendly company (Really?). In 2013, 95 percent of their coffee was ethically sourced, and their goal is to reach 100 percent by 2015.1 Other goals include reducing water consumption by 25 percent in their company-operated stores by 20152 and mobilizing their employees and ...
Group Polarization and the Fad of Ethno-masochism
2014 11 26
From "Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 6 50 (6): 1141--1151 The psychology of White self hatred. Political correctness IS a mental disorder. More: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Isenberg, Daniel J. the paper Indoctrinate U Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev talks about how to end the White race The History of Political Correctness The Narrative: The origins of Political ...
Credo: A Nietzschean Testament by Jonathan Bowden
2014 11 26
This lecture by Jonathan Bowden was given at the 11th New Right meeting in London on September 8, 2007. The original title of the presentation was “The Art and Philosophy of Jonathan Bowden.” I think ideas are inborn, and you’re attracted, if you have any, toward certain systems of thinking and sensibility and response. From a very young age, I was ...
A Look Back at the OJ Simpson Verdict -- Reactions
2014 11 26
This is a look back at the different reactions to the OJ Simpson verdict some 20 years ago (exact date of verdict was Oct 3, 1995). The OJ Simpson jury consisted of 9 Blacks, 1 Hispanic, and 2 Whites. It would raise eyebrows after they only deliberated for 4 hours in a case that they were involved in for almost ...
New York Times Publishes Darren Wilson’s Street Address and Photo of House #Ferguson
2014 11 26
Hey here are the two @nytimes scumbags that published Wilson’s home address. —> @juliebosman & @campbellnyt— Ben Howe (@BenHowe) November 25, 2014 Michael Brown’s Stepdad Shouting ‘Burn This Bitch Down’ The New York Times published information about the address of Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson on Monday in a move that has generated controversy. Tensions are running high in Ferguson, Missouri, as ...
More News »