Whatís in a name? Quite a lot, if you live in Iceland
Recent decades have ushered in an era of creative baby names Ė at least in Hollywood. But not every country embraces such unique labels. In the first case of its kind, a 15-year-old girl in Iceland is suing the state for the right to use her name.
Blaer Bjarkardottirís first name is not on the official list of approved names issued by the Icelandic government, causing her to be identified simply as ďStulkaĒ Ė or ďgirlĒ on all her official documents.
The stateís refusal to accept the teenagerís name has led to years of frustration, as she is constantly forced to explain the story when filling out forms or dealing with the countryís bureaucratic system.
Iceland is one of several nations, including Germany and Denmark, which has rules regarding what a baby can be called.
The countryís ďPersonal Names RegisterĒ contains a list of 1,712 male names and 1,853 female names that fit Icelandic grammar and pronunciation rules and that officials say will protect children from embarrassment.
Parents can apply to a special committee for names which are not on the list. Blaerís family did just that, but the name was rejected because it takes on a masculine article. Undeterred, Blaer filed a lawsuit against the state. The decision is expected January 25.
Blaerís mother says she learned the name wasnít on the register after the priest who baptized her daughter later informed her that he had mistakenly allowed it.
"I had no idea that the name wasnít on the list, the famous list of names that you can choose from," Bjork Eidsdottir told AP.
Eidsdottir hopes her daughter will win the lawsuit Ė the very first of its kind.
"So many strange names have been allowed, which makes this even more frustrating because Blaer is a perfectly Icelandic name," she told AP. "It seems like a basic human right to be able to name your child what you want, especially if it doesnít harm your child in any wayÖand my daughter loves her name.Ē
However, history suggests that Blaer may have an uphill battle ahead of her. In the past, the name ďCarolinaĒ was rejected because the letter ďcĒ is not part of Icleandís 32-letter alphabet and ďSataniaĒ was shot down because it was deemed too close to ďSatan.Ē
"The law is pretty straightforward so in many cases itís clearly going to be a yes or a no," said Agusta Thorbergsdottir, the head of the government committee which will hear the case.
But the determined teen says sheís prepared to take the case all the way to the countryís Supreme Court if the court doesnít overturn the decision.
Given names hold extreme importance in Iceland. Surnames are based on a parentís given name and everyone in the phone book is listed by their first name.
Article from: rt.com
Interestingly, Iíve had several Icelanders tell me they believe a person should be able to name their child whatever they want, but then, a few minutes later will point out the ďridiculousnessĒ of certain names that the committee has approvedónames that they wouldnít have approved themselves.
It seems that sometimes Icelanders are torn between wanting to believe in an ethos of individuality and independence, but also wanting this individuality and independence to remain within the homogeneity of their population. Names in Iceland have, for centuries, reflected homogeneity.
I recently read an article by Bob Brooke which said that since the 13th century in Iceland, 25% of males have been named Jůn. In the 1703 census, over half of all men and women had names that were found in the top ten respective lists. The greatest increase in diversity of names was from 1921 to 1950, a time which, (not coincidentally) coincided with a lot of economic and political change in Iceland.
I forget this when I look at Reykjavikís spotless streets and well-dressed, healthy, populace, but until relatively recently, Iceland was quite poor. Because of its geographical isolation, it took a long time for many technological and social innovations to reach Iceland. A huge proportion of the population was living off subsistence farming in turf houses into the 20th century when fisheries finally became industrialized and the Marshall Plan went into effect after World War II.
These factors combined made Iceland skyrocket to being one of the wealthiest countries in the world by the 1990s.
Itís interesting to me that this period of time was also when there began to be much greater diversity in names. Itís unsurprising that as there was more access to other parts of the world through trade and technology, Icelanders would start picking up on different names as well. But it was also around this time, a time of huge economic growth, and gaining independence, that there were also huge questions about what Icelandic identity consisted of in relationship to all of this.
The answer seems to be largely linguistic. People say that Icelandic is a virtually untouched language. When Icelandís first settlers left Norway in the 9th century, all of Scandinavia spoke one language. As a result, modern Icelandic is very similar to this original language, whereas in comparison, Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish and Danish have all changed much more. This is partly because of Icelandís geographic isolation, but also because it has always had an astoundingly high literacy rate, which helped preserve and pass on its language. Modern Icelandic is supposedly very close to that original Scandinavian tongue -- whereas Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish and Danish have all changed substantially.
Latest News from our Front Page
Professor: Reason Itself Is A White Male Construct
A philosophy and religion professor at Syracuse University gave an interview to The New York Times Thursday in which he critiqued the notion of pure reason as simply being a “white male Euro-Christian construction.”
Prof. John Caputo was being interviewed by fellow philosophy professor George Yancy for the 13th installment of an interview series Yancy conducts with philosophers regarding racial topics.
Given its emphasis on first principles ...
The Broken Window Fallacy
Youtube description: This short video explains one of the most persistent economic fallacies of our day.
Jenji Kohan and the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture
As detailed in The Culture of Critique, Freud and his followers regarded anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. The theoretical basis for this can be found in Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality where he linked aggression to the frustration of human drives — especially the sex drive. Kevin MacDonald notes that: ...
Confederate History - Dispelling the Myths
History books, the media, the school systems, etc abound in falsehoods and inaccuracies of Confederate and Southern history. This fact sheet will help to clarify and dispell some of these rampant inaccuracies.
MYTH - The War of 1861 - 1865 was fought over slavery.
FACT - Terribly untrue. The North fought the war over money. Plain ...
Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights
Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation.
A recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage may soon allow pedophiles to argue they are suffering discrimination.
‚ÄúUsing the same tactics used by ‚Äėgay‚Äô rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals,‚ÄĚ writes Jack Minor ...
|More News » |